James
Hayes Shofner "Jim" Cooper (born
June 19, 1954) is the U.S. Representative for Tennessee's 5th congressional
distric (based in Nashville), serving since 2003. He is a member of the
Democratic Party and the Blue Dog Coalition and he previously represented
Tennessee's 4th congressional district from 1983 to 1995.
In his book Down on the Island, Jim Cooper talks about Puerto Rican culture
through the eyes of a continental American professor teaching students in the
Colegio de Mayagüez. In his chapter Helping he references a specific
phenomenon of the Puerto Rican culture that continues to be a debated topic
everywhere. Cooper brings up his concern
that cheating was done in Puerto Rico in an open and public way, more than he
had ever seen. He states the difference
of how cheating is seen in the States and how it is thought of here on the
island. He brings up the whole situation
that since early stages of the development, teachers are encouraging their
students to help each other, making it seem like a good and valid action. He also points that the whole system
“approves” of the cheating behavior since the behavioral model that is seen
between students is a cooperative one rather than a competitive one. The whole helping others idea (even though
not the whole idea of it) is spread through the Puerto Rican culture impacting
the preparation with which students got to college and it reflected in the
teaching and learning of the English language on the island.
Reading this essay by Jim Cooper
made me want to situate myself and my opinion among the many streams that the
present debate unfolds. It is true that
Puerto Ricans exhibit a cooperative behavior most of the time, but it doesn’t
mean that it shows up only on the academic aspect. I don’t believe that we Puerto Ricans
cooperate academically more than other cultures for no reason. It is something that comes from the way the
whole system is build up. For example,
most of the teaching done in our schools just focuses on specific tests that
are coming up and not really on the learning experience. I personally do not believe that tests
(including standardized ones) reflect the true enrichment that a student is
having academically, because it forces the learning process. Students are pushed to memorize large
quantities of material and the true learning process is lost; that is when
cheating comes up. Even though I do not sponsor cheating on tests, I do believe
that cooperative teaching and learning is the correct path to go through. This means that the learning process (which
is not the moment of taking a test) should be based on students helping other
students for ideas to be transmitted in clearer and more familiar ways. In contrast to the cooperative model, there’s
the competitive model of behavior. I
prefer the cooperative model because I’ve never been a person who likes
competition; in fact, I do not believe that there even exists a positive kind
of competition. Even though it is a fact
that competition can bring out the best of someone, it is also true that it can
bring out the worst. Sadly, the
organization of the educational process of our nation forces each one of us to
become part of the competition in order to achieve what we want. Only those who excel in standardized tests
are the ones who get the opportunity to prove themselves good at something;
only those who get the chance to relate to powerful people are the ones who get
the chance to become what they want. It
is at this time that we are forced to become part of a competition that ends in
no positive results at all.
While it is true that the
cooperative model is not correct in all aspects of our life, it is also true that
the competitive model can also represent a threat to our integrity. Being in a
competition towards a specific goal can make us blind and lead ourselves to
step on others no matter how bad it could hurt them. It is at this time that, no matter how good
we could become due to competition, our basic human values become destroyed and
therefore competition has destroyed ourselves.
That is the reason why we should maintain in a neutral position, where
it is possible to maintain a balance between these two extremes. We should be able to take competition as a
way of trying to emulate the positive things those around us have, becoming
better ourselves, but not to a level where we compete just for the destruction
of the other competitors. As a perfect
balance we should practice a competition where the rules that guide the whole
game are compassion and comprehension; that way a cooperative aura will come by
naturally, establishing the perfect harmony in between them and the combination
that better works for us humans.
Jim Cooper focuses this whole debate in the English teaching in Puerto Rico. Why Puerto Ricans know or do not know English has always been a sensitive topic because of the diversity of opinions. I found a really curious site where different English teachers in Puerto Rico talk about their professional experiences in the island: Teaching English in Puerto Rico. It is possible to see that not all teachers have had bad experiences and those who have had difficulties do not make reference to the "Helping/Cheating" behavior. This may be a good link to read and take the time to reflect, as part of the education system, about the reality in which we are included and wether Jim Cooper made an objective characterization of the Puerto Rican students and the system.
Wow, I am amazed how great you describe the situation happening here. I like a lot 2 things that you said, "Students are pushed to memorize large quantities of material and the true learning process is lost; that is when cheating comes up. Even though I do not sponsor cheating on tests, I do believe that cooperative teaching and learning is the correct path to go through." because this is something that is happening in almost every subject that we take. Today's tests are been made asking students for specific details on things that happened instead of trying to proof if the student knows the subject. A reality that you mention that I almost forgot is when you say "Being in a competition towards a specific goal can make us blind and lead ourselves to step on others no matter how bad it could hurt them.". This is something that most of the people forget about but then after completing their main goals in life, they are then asking why are people so different with them, and it is because of all the people that you hurt when you were trying to reach your goal, not necessary in the best way.
ReplyDeleteI agree a lot with both of you.. Competition not necessarily makes you better and sometimes it brings unexpected negative feelings with it :/
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with your hypothesis about why Puerto Rican students cheat. I don not believe that standardized tests prove how much a person knows. I think there are many types of intelligences, so a test does not demonstrate how intelligent a person really is.
ReplyDelete